H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Paola Suarez H2H: 4-0
Dominique Monami holds a 4–0 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 2000 Sydney third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2000* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-2 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| May 18, 1996* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Dominique Monami | 6-0 6-1 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-0 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 2-0 (ret.) | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |