H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-2
Wiltrud Probst holds a 2–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on carpet, while Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1998 Paris fourth round 5-7 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1998* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Dominique Monami | 5-7 6-2 7-6 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1994* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 6-3 6-0 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| May 8, 1992* | Waregem | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-2 6-1 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |