Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Donna Faber vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 1-0
Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Mothes Jobkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1988 Roland Garros round of 128 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-0 6-4 | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | Match data | May 25, 1988* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,603 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Donna Faber | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 21 | 25 | 46 | 45.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Donna Faber | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 | 1988 | 1485 | 95.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 19 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 | 1989 | 1499 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 | 1990 | 1518 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 50.0% | +0.09 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.02 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 | 1991 | 1514 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +31 | — | 30.0% | -1.80 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1558 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +54 | — | 42.4% | -0.82 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–4 (33%) | 102.6 | -0.05 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1589 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 45.8% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1579 | 93.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1597 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1593 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| Career | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 | — | 1604 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +45 | — | 39.8% | -0.99 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–11 (21%) | 100.2 | +1.22 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Catherine Mothes Jobkel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 1996 | H2H |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 26, 1993 | H2H |
| Cecilia Dahlman | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 8, 1993 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 17, 1992 | H2H |