Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Donna Faber holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1992 Boca Raton round of 64 6-1 6-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-1 6-7 7-5 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data | Mar 4, 1992* | R64 | Boca Raton | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Donna Faber | 6-4 6-4 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data | Aug 28, 1991* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Donna Faber | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 55 | 50 | 105 | 52.4% | 28 | 24 | 52 | 53.8% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Donna Faber | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 | 1989 | 1486 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 | 1990 | 1498 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1647 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +44 | — | 48.1% | -0.22 | 6–3 (67%) | 5–5 (50%) | 106.2 | -1.02 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1649 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +33 | -159 | 48.5% | -0.17 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | 98.8 | +0.26 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1737 | 139.0 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -4 | -162 | 52.6% | +0.62 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.91 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1777 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -21 | -203 | 61.0% | +0.87 | 5–3 (63%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.6 | +1.21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1773 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -13 | +12 | — | 60.0% | +0.67 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.56 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1721 | 92.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1639 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | -6 | 30.4% | -1.22 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1573 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.71 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.9 | +1.00 |
| Career | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 | — | 1865 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +11 | -127 | 50.6% | +0.14 | 23–28 (45%) | 18–17 (51%) | 99.4 | -0.14 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 6 | 7 | Sep 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 8, 1992 | H2H |
| Chanda Rubin | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 24, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 6, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 19, 1995 | H2H |