H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Donna Faber vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 1-2
Halle Cioffi holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Halle Cioffi leads 2–0 on clay, while Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1992 Strasbourg third round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1992* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Halle Cioffi | 7-6 7-6 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1989* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Halle Cioffi | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1989* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-4 6-3 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |