H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Donna Faber vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1

Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Indianapolis round of 32 6-4 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Gompert #22 6-4 6-2 Donna Faber #268 Match data Oct 28, 1987* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Gompert #316 #18 34 1,871 85 81 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Faber Kate Gompert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0 1980 3–2 60.0% 1,538 0 0
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0 1981 4–3 57.1% 1,583 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0 1982 7–7 50.0% 1,588 0 0
20 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0 1983 6–3 66.7% 1,672 0 0
21 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0 1984 4–5 44.4% #98 1,651 0 0
22 1985 11–8 57.9% 1,724 0 0
23 1986 21–21 50.0% #35 1,781 0 0
24 1987 25–18 58.1% #22 1,830 0 0
26 1989 3–11 21.4% #175 1,659 0 0
27 1990 1–3 25.0% #301 1,621 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Faber Kate Gompert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0%
20 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 37 38 75 49.3% 26 18 44 59.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Faber Kate Gompert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23 1980 1539 117.9 60.0% +0.90 0–1 -0.24
18 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90 1981 1584 114.4 +12 60.0% +0.73 0–1 -0.14
19 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62 1982 1588 109.9 -24 56.0% +0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.45
20 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56 1983 1673 129.7 -18 -62 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.11
21 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77 1984 1651 117.2 -40 -19 50.0% +0.55 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +0.68
22 1985 1725 135.5 -45 -15 60.0% +0.80 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +1.32
23 1986 1781 143.3 +2 -61 -244 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 100.8 -3.20
24 1987 1830 154.9 -15 +13 56.4% +0.64 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 -2.21
26 1989 1659 99.4 +9 +88 22.6% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.02
27 1990 1622 106.2 +31 33.3% -1.00 +0.25
Career 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33 1871 143.4 -12 -7 -244 51.7% +0.26 19–19 (50%) 8–16 (33%) 97.5 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.