Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Italian Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Garrone | Match data | May 9, 1990* | R64 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Donna Faber | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 88 | 90 | 178 | 49.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Donna Faber | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 | 1984 | 1491 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 |
| 17 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 | 1985 | 1530 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +58 | — | 50.0% | +0.09 | 1–1 | — | — | +1.29 |
| 18 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 | 1986 | 1679 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | -125 | +127 | — | 60.2% | +0.82 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.8 | +2.90 |
| 19 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 | 1987 | 1612 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +112 | -43 | 46.7% | -0.13 | 6–7 (46%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.4 | +4.27 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 | 1988 | 1638 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -120 | +69 | — | 49.4% | -0.04 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.6 | +1.56 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 | 1989 | 1608 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +56 | — | 44.1% | -0.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.9 | +2.18 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1609 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +31 | — | 47.8% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.1 | +1.49 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1623 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -83 | -31 | +17 | 42.6% | -0.87 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 100.5 | -0.55 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1559 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +20 | — | 32.4% | -1.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.6 | -0.10 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1522 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | 25.0% | -1.37 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1520 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1492 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | 31.3% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.33 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1468 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 33.3% | -0.56 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.48 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1501 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| Career | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 | — | 1726 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +56 | -17 | 46.4% | -0.19 | 36–45 (44%) | 18–21 (46%) | 97.2 | +5.60 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Cueto | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 20, 1990 | H2H |
| Sandra Cecchini | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 28, 1994 | H2H |
| Bettina Fulco | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Veronika Martinek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 12, 1994 | H2H |