H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Donna Faber vs Nanne Dahlman H2H: 0-1

Nanne Dahlman holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nanne Dahlman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nanne Dahlman won the 1992 Australian Open round of 128 2-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Faber
USA Age 55
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nanne Dahlman
FIN Age 56 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nanne Dahlman #168 2-6 6-3 7-5 Donna Faber #97 Match data Jan 15, 1992* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nanne Dahlman #743 #59 177 1,604 35 63 35.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Faber Nanne Dahlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #357 1,494 0 0
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0 1989 2–1 66.7% #276 1,519 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0 1990 1–3 25.0% #175 1,504 0 0
20 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #161 1,522 0 0
21 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0 1992 11–12 47.8% #67 1,592 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1993 7–18 28.0% #143 1,522 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #194 1,503 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1995 4–11 26.7% #107 1,471 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #129 1,489 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Faber Nanne Dahlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 10 14 28.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — 15 28 43 34.9% 10 24 34 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 6 14 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Faber Nanne Dahlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23 1988 1494 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
18 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90 1989 1520 108.4 — — — — — +61 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — +0.46
19 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62 1990 1504 103.3 — — — — — +54 — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–1 — -0.05
20 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56 1991 1523 105.1 — — — — -9 +49 — 34.8% -1.26 3–0 (100%) — — +0.16
21 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77 1992 1593 116.9 — — — — -2 -54 — 48.1% -0.14 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 +1.83
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1523 110.6 — — — — +46 -71 +65 28.8% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 +0.88
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1504 104.6 — — — — +46 — — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.13
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1472 98.8 — — — — +68 -47 — 29.0% -1.65 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.57
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1489 107.5 — — — — +67 — — 42.9% -0.24 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
Career — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33 — 1605 111.8 — — — — +39 -11 +65 36.8% -0.86 10–10 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 97.6 +4.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.