H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Donna Faber vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1992 Wellington final 6-4 6-0.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Noelle Van Lottum 6-4 6-0 Donna Faber #119 Match data Feb 9, 1992* F Wellington Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Noelle Van Lottum 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Faber Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0 1988 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% 1,533 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% 1,580 0 0
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% 1,531 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% 1,610 0 1
20 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% 1,582 0 1
21 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% 1,575 0 1
22 1995 1–9 10.0% 1,465 0 1
23 1996 0–2 0.0% 1,441 0 1
24 1997 2–9 18.2% 1,426 0 1
25 1998 1–2 33.3% 1,428 0 1
26 1999 0–1 0.0% 1,416 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Faber Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1998 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1999 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Faber Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11 1988 1507 102.1 60.0% +0.60 0–1 +0.28
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30 1989 1533 105.7 +43 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +0.90
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23 1990 1581 116.6 +44 60.0% -0.10 1–0 +0.14
18 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90 1991 1532 111.1 +43 +16 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) +0.26
19 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62 1992 1610 125.2 +39 -43 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56 1993 1583 123.6 +35 -30 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77 1994 1576 110.9 +14 +11 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) -0.09
22 1995 1465 92.1 +55 +58 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 +0.63
23 1996 1442 96.3 20.0% -2.80 0–1 +0.13
24 1997 1427 107.1 +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.01
25 1998 1429 97.9 +33 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.19
26 1999 1416 +0.09
Career 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33 1646 119.1 +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.