Donna Faber
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Donna Faber vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 0-1
Patricia Tarabini holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Tarabini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Tarabini won the 1987 Charleston Open round of 64 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Tarabini | 6-4 7-5 | Donna Faber | Match data | Apr 1, 1987* | R64 | Charleston Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Tarabini | #617 | #29 | 29 | 1,746 | 105 | 123 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #126 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Donna Faber | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1987 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 22 | 29 | 51 | 43.1% | 80 | 82 | 162 | 49.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Donna Faber | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 | 1986 | 1563 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +77 | — | 58.1% | +0.45 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +2.12 |
| 18 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 | 1987 | 1627 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +13 | — | 42.9% | -0.30 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 100.2 | +1.32 |
| 19 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 | 1988 | 1733 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +8 | — | 57.6% | +0.36 | 7–0 (100%) | 4–1 (80%) | 110.1 | -0.68 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 | 1989 | 1694 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -24 | +3 | — | 51.9% | +0.15 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.9 | +1.92 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 | 1990 | 1659 | 126.4 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +82 | — | 47.5% | -0.25 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.7 | -0.18 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1654 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +85 | — | 41.7% | -0.42 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -1.50 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1636 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +72 | — | 45.2% | -0.43 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.08 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1668 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -154 | +126 | — | 52.9% | +0.14 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.7 | +0.16 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1582 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -87 | +101 | — | 31.1% | -1.64 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.9 | +0.59 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1518 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +66 | — | 14.3% | -2.36 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.49 |
| Career | — | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 | — | 1747 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -62 | +59 | — | 46.8% | -0.25 | 30–28 (52%) | 16–18 (47%) | 99.4 | +1.84 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Patricia Tarabini
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Sabine Hack | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 23, 1994 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 23, 1993 | H2H |