H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Donna Faber vs Petra Langrova H2H: 1-2

Petra Langrova holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1991 Indianapolis round of 32 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Faber
USA Age 55
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Petra Langrova
TCH Age 56

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Langrova #88 7-6 6-3 Donna Faber #87 Match data Nov 14, 1991* R32 Indianapolis Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Donna Faber #64 7-5 7-5 Petra Langrova #79 Match data May 30, 1990* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Petra Langrova #68 2-6 6-4 6-1 Donna Faber #71 Match data Apr 4, 1990* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Langrova #895 #53 453 1,700 81 117 40.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Faber Petra Langrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0 1988 5–2 71.4% #100 1,581 0 1
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0 1989 12–16 42.9% #78 1,620 0 1
20 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0 1990 12–15 44.4% #80 1,616 0 1
21 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0 1991 14–19 42.4% #86 1,597 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1992 8–14 36.4% #134 1,561 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1993 7–11 38.9% #103 1,558 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1994 5–9 35.7% #106 1,568 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1995 7–10 41.2% #137 1,571 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1996 7–6 53.8% #66 1,626 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1997 4–14 22.2% #133 1,523 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #249 1,509 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Faber Petra Langrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 3 6 9 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% — 16 33 49 32.7% 54 63 117 46.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Faber Petra Langrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90 1988 1581 119.1 — — — — — +77 — 62.5% +0.50 2–0 3–1 (75%) — +1.11
19 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62 1989 1621 121.4 — — — — -125 +103 — 43.9% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 102.8 +0.67
20 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56 1990 1616 124.6 — — — — -72 +52 — 47.6% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.15
21 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77 1991 1597 128.3 — — — — -3 +40 — 40.3% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.13
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1562 116.3 — — — — +4 +55 — 40.4% -0.72 6–7 (46%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +0.27
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1559 114.9 — — — — +30 +27 — 45.0% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.13
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1568 112.8 — — — — -26 +63 — 43.2% -0.95 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — +0.21
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1572 110.3 — — — — -25 +25 — 40.5% -0.51 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1626 114.6 — — — — -34 -13 — 53.3% +0.07 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — +0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1523 109.5 — — — — +46 +26 — 26.3% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1509 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33 — 1701 124.6 — — — — -24 +47 — 42.9% -0.60 32–37 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.9 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.