H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Donna Faber vs Sabine Hack H2H: 1-1
Donna Faber and Sabine Hack are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on clay, while Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1992 Wellington fourth round 7-5 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1992* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Donna Faber | 7-5 3-6 6-0 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1991* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-1 6-1 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |