H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Donna Faber vs Shaun Stafford H2H: 1-1
Donna Faber and Shaun Stafford are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shaun Stafford leads 1–0 on clay, while Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Key Biscayne first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1990* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-2 6-1 | Shaun Stafford | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1989* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Shaun Stafford | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaun Stafford | #803 | #48 | 31 | 1,772 | 90 | 132 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Faber | Shaun Stafford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #121 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #51 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #74 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #55 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #97 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #388 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |