H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Duk Hee Lee vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-1
Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Duk Hee Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1980 Montreal third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1980* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-1 | Duk Hee Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duk Hee Lee | — | — | — | 1,749 | 57 | 82 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Duk Hee Lee | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |