H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Duk Hee Lee vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-2

Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Duk Hee Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1982 Tampa round of 32 6-0 6-0.

H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Duk Hee Lee Match data Oct 14, 1982* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-0 6-0 Duk Hee Lee Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Duk Hee Lee — — — 1,748 57 82 41.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Duk Hee Lee Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8
18 1972 0–4 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20
19 1973 3–5 37.5% — 1,489 0 0 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36
20 — — — — — — — 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52
21 — — — — — — — 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64
22 — — — — — — — 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75
23 1977 1–0 100.0% — 1,506 0 1 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82
24 — — — — — — — 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90
25 — — — — — — — 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98
26 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,527 0 1 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107
27 1981 20–17 54.1% — 1,715 0 2 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117
28 1982 14–22 38.9% — 1,703 0 2 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123
29 1983 7–14 33.3% — 1,655 0 2 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129
30 — — — — — — — 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150
33 — — — — — — — 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Duk Hee Lee Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 1973 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 15 20 35 42.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 1 10 11 9.1% — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Duk Hee Lee Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05
18 1972 1474 101.9 — — — — — — +22 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.37 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25
19 1973 1490 110.0 — — — — — +6 +38 37.5% -1.06 — 0–1 — +0.03 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71
23 1977 1506 105.4 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.25 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52
26 1980 1527 109.2 — — — — -1 +61 -39 39.4% -1.31 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +0.35 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00
27 1981 1716 132.5 — — — — -46 -104 — 53.4% -0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.6 -0.09 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08
28 1982 1704 127.7 — — — — -116 -29 — 37.8% -1.06 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 107.2 -3.73 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42
29 1983 1656 116.4 — — — — -62 +6 — 34.0% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -1.32 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27
Career — 1748 125.0 — — — — -56 -21 +10 41.4% -0.90 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 101.0 -3.51 — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.