H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Duk Hee Lee vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-1

Duk Hee Lee and Claudia Kohde Kilsch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Duk Hee Lee leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Austin round-robin match 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Duk Hee Lee
Age 73
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 1982 Austin WTA 250 RR Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch 6-4 6-3 Duk Hee Lee Match data
May 29, 1980* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Duk Hee Lee 6-3 7-5 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Duk Hee Lee — — — 1,749 57 82 41.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Duk Hee Lee Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1972 0–4 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1973 3–5 37.5% — 1,489 0 0 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 — — — — — — — 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 — — — — — — — 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1977 1–0 100.0% — 1,506 0 1 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 — — — — — — — 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 — — — — — — — 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,526 0 1 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1981 20–17 54.1% — 1,715 0 2 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1982 14–22 38.9% — 1,704 0 2 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1983 7–14 33.3% — 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —