H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Duk Hee Lee vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 0-3
Eva Pfaff holds a 3–0 lead over Duk Hee Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1983 Amelia Island third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1983* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Eva Pfaff | 7-5 6-2 | Duk Hee Lee | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 7-6 6-3 | Duk Hee Lee | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1982 | Austin | WTA 250 | RR | Carpet | Eva Pfaff | 6-4 6-4 | Duk Hee Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duk Hee Lee | — | — | — | 1,749 | 57 | 82 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Duk Hee Lee | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |