H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Duk Hee Lee vs Glynis Coles H2H: 2-0
Duk Hee Lee holds a 2–0 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Duk Hee Lee leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Duk Hee Lee won the 1982 Wimbledon first round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 73
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Duk Hee Lee | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1980* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Duk Hee Lee | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duk Hee Lee | — | — | — | 1,749 | 57 | 82 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Duk Hee Lee | Glynis Coles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 |