H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Duk Hee Lee vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-1

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Duk Hee Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1980 Chichester round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Duk Hee Lee
KOR Age 73
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 6-4 Duk Hee Lee Match data Jun 10, 1980* R64 Chichester WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Duk Hee Lee — — — 1,747 57 82 41.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Duk Hee Lee Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1972 0–4 0.0% — 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1973 3–5 37.5% — 1,489 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1977 1–0 100.0% — 1,506 0 1 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,526 0 1 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1981 20–17 54.1% — 1,715 0 2 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1982 14–22 38.9% — 1,702 0 2 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1983 7–14 33.3% — 1,655 0 2 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Duk Hee Lee Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1973 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 15 20 35 42.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 1 10 11 9.1% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Duk Hee Lee Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1972 1474 101.9 — — — — — — +22 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1973 1490 110.0 — — — — — +6 +38 37.5% -1.06 — 0–1 — -0.16 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1977 1506 105.4 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.25 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1980 1527 109.0 — — — — -6 +61 -39 39.4% -1.31 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +0.17 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1981 1715 132.2 — — — — -48 -104 — 53.4% -0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.6 -0.07 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1982 1703 127.5 — — — — -117 -29 — 37.8% -1.06 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 107.2 -4.70 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1983 1655 116.4 — — — — -62 +7 — 34.0% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -1.28 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1747 124.8 — — — — -58 -21 +10 41.4% -0.90 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 101.0 -4.43 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.