H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Duk Hee Lee vs Lele Forood H2H: 1-1
Duk Hee Lee and Lele Forood are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Duk Hee Lee leads 1–0 on clay, while Lele Forood leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Duk Hee Lee won the 1983 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Duk Hee Lee | 6-2 6-4 | Lele Forood | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lele Forood | 6-4 6-1 | Duk Hee Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duk Hee Lee | — | — | — | 1,749 | 57 | 82 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Duk Hee Lee | Lele Forood | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1983 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |