H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Duk Hee Lee vs Sue Barker H2H: 1-0
Duk Hee Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Duk Hee Lee leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Duk Hee Lee won the 1983 Lugano second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Duk Hee Lee | 6-4 6-3 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duk Hee Lee | — | — | — | 1,749 | 57 | 82 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Duk Hee Lee | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1981 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1982 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1983 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |