H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elena Baltacha vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-1
Elena Baltacha and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on grass, while Elena Baltacha leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Baltacha | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Baltacha | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |