H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Baltacha vs Milagros Sequera H2H: 0-2
Milagros Sequera holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Baltacha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milagros Sequera leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Milagros Sequera won the 2007 Birmingham second round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2007* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Milagros Sequera | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Milagros Sequera | 6-4 6-2 | Elena Baltacha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milagros Sequera | #1,060 | #48 | 537 | 1,629 | 32 | 51 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Baltacha | Milagros Sequera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #103 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #74 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |