H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Baltacha vs Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro H2H: 1-0
Elena Baltacha holds a 1–0 lead over Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Baltacha leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Baltacha won the 2005 Australian Open second round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Baltacha | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | #183 | #61 | 760 | 1,599 | 44 | 80 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Baltacha | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #68 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #112 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #122 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |