H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-3

Amanda Coetzer holds a 3–2 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2003 Amelia Island fourth round 7-6(2) 6-3.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2003* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Elena Dementieva #21 7-6(2) 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #22 6-3 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data
Aug 15, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amanda Coetzer #32 6-3 6-3 Elena Dementieva #13 Match data
Mar 4, 2001* Acapulco WTA 250 F Clay Amanda Coetzer #11 2-6 6-1 6-2 Elena Dementieva #10 Match data
Apr 21, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #19 6-2 6-4 Elena Dementieva #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9