H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-1

Elena Dementieva holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2004 San Diego quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 QF Hard Elena Dementieva #6 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #25 Match data
Aug 31, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #11 7-6(1) 7-6(3) Amy Frazier #42 Match data
Mar 8, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Elena Dementieva #14 6-3 1-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #50 Match data
Aug 16, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #20 6-4 6-2 Elena Dementieva #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8