H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 4-1

Elena Dementieva holds a 4–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 6-2 7-6(3).

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Elena Dementieva #5 6-2 7-6(3) Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #4 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #21 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Dementieva #11 5-7 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
Aug 27, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 6-4 6-3 Elena Dementieva #6 Match data
Apr 15, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Elena Dementieva #6 6-2 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11