H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 2-0
Elena Dementieva holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Stanford third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2009* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-1 6-4 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 6-4 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Anne Keothavong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |