H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 5-2

Elena Dementieva holds a 5–2 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2004 Los Angeles fourth round 7-5 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #6 7-5 7-6(8) Chanda Rubin #25 Match data
Nov 5, 2003 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Elena Dementieva #9 4-6 7-5 6-1 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Sep 21, 2003* Shanghai WTA 500 F Hard Elena Dementieva #8 6-3 7-6(6) Chanda Rubin #9 Match data
Sep 14, 2003* Bali WTA 250 F Hard Elena Dementieva #9 6-2 6-1 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Feb 1, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Chanda Rubin #12 3-6 6-1 6-3 Elena Dementieva #22 Match data
Jan 9, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #13 6-3 7-5 Elena Dementieva #20 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Elena Dementieva #59 6-4 6-1 Chanda Rubin #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7