H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-3

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–2 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2003 New Haven fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-0.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2003* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #12 4-6 6-2 6-0 Conchita Martínez #13 Match data
Jan 9, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #39 6-4 3-6 6-1 Elena Dementieva #15 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #25 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #7 Match data
Apr 13, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #8 7-5 6-2 Elena Dementieva #34 Match data
Sep 5, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #17 6-2 2-6 6-4 Elena Dementieva #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33