H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 1999 US Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data | Sep 2, 1999* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,125 | 483 | 245 | 66.3% | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 16 |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,835 | 117 | 99 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,897 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 56–17 | 76.7% | #4 | 2,050 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,987 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,955 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1999 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1998 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1999 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2000 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2002 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2006 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2003 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2007 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2004 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2008 | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2005 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 35 | 11 | 46 | 76.1% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 287 | 142 | 429 | 66.9% | 103 | 55 | 158 | 65.2% | 41 | 20 | 61 | 67.2% | 52 | 28 | 80 | 65.0% | — | 49 | 53 | 102 | 48.0% | 66 | 37 | 103 | 64.1% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/527 of Elena Dementieva's and 26/112 of Fabiola Zuluaga's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2003 | 8/72 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 63.6% | 65.3% | 42.0% | 57.8% | 70.6% | 56.9% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 13/63 | 0.8 | 9.8 | 57.2% | 62.8% | 38.5% | 44.9% | 55.2% | 52.5% | 49.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 21/63 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 57.0% | 62.1% | 39.9% | 50.1% | 50.1% | 52.2% | 50.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 46/66 | 0.8 | 8.4 | 60.8% | 61.8% | 41.0% | 50.6% | 49.1% | 53.7% | 49.9% | 2003 | 8/38 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 56.6% | 68.1% | 47.8% | 59.6% | 55.8% | 59.6% | 46.2% |
| 25 | 2007 | 54/59 | 1.5 | 7.1 | 56.6% | 64.7% | 44.3% | 48.3% | 57.1% | 55.7% | 50.7% | 2004 | 12/49 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 55.4% | 67.5% | 49.0% | 54.0% | 52.2% | 59.2% | 45.9% |
| 26 | 2008 | 59/73 | 1.5 | 4.1 | 64.0% | 63.4% | 45.2% | 57.6% | 53.0% | 56.9% | 48.6% | 2005 | 6/25 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 56.3% | 69.4% | 50.7% | 60.1% | 61.3% | 60.2% | 52.1% |
| 27 | 2009 | 67/73 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 60.2% | 67.3% | 47.2% | 57.5% | 53.7% | 59.5% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 51/58 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 64.7% | 63.3% | 47.4% | 56.6% | 54.7% | 57.9% | 50.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 319/728 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 60.8% | 64.1% | 44.5% | 53.8% | 53.9% | 56.5% | 49.7% | — | 26/216 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 56.0% | 68.1% | 49.0% | 57.1% | 55.4% | 59.5% | 47.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1997 | 1493 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 1994 | 1485 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 16 | 1998 | 1479 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.13 | 1995 | 1481 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 17 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -3 | — | 54.0% | +0.38 | 1–7 (13%) | 0–1 | — | +1.54 | 1996 | 1465 | 96.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1897 | 159.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -186 | — | 59.6% | +0.65 | 17–7 (71%) | 7–5 (58%) | 112.6 | -1.08 | 1997 | 1460 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1841 | 149.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -69 | -259 | 58.3% | +0.58 | 8–10 (44%) | 4–6 (40%) | 95.9 | +1.46 | 1998 | 1505 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 63.6% | +0.18 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.29 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1764 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -19 | -9 | 60.1% | +0.78 | 7–16 (30%) | 9–12 (43%) | 87.6 | +3.61 | 1999 | 1686 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -128 | +93 | — | 59.7% | +0.76 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | +1.62 |
| 21 | 2003 | 1967 | 156.8 | +1.60 | +2.78 | 1.106 | 52.3% | -16 | -140 | -134 | 61.8% | +0.81 | 15–12 (56%) | 10–3 (77%) | 107.7 | -1.46 | 2000 | 1713 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -95 | +91 | — | 50.6% | +0.08 | 8–5 (62%) | 1–3 (25%) | 104.6 | -0.66 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1976 | 161.0 | -0.64 | +4.50 | 1.046 | 51.0% | +8 | -84 | — | 58.0% | +0.42 | 14–4 (78%) | 7–3 (70%) | 108.8 | -2.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1916 | 156.8 | -1.41 | +5.17 | 1.059 | 51.3% | +26 | -5 | -155 | 59.7% | +0.74 | 18–6 (75%) | 8–3 (73%) | 108.8 | +2.18 | 2002 | 1667 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +130 | — | 54.2% | +0.19 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.8 | +0.66 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1922 | 155.6 | -0.92 | +5.86 | 1.077 | 51.8% | +31 | -42 | -40 | 61.4% | +0.70 | 18–3 (86%) | 9–1 (90%) | 116.2 | +1.22 | 2003 | 1739 | 143.7 | +2.36 | +1.63 | 1.143 | 53.0% | -113 | +126 | — | 53.0% | +0.79 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–7 (22%) | 101.6 | -1.64 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1969 | 151.5 | +0.08 | +6.52 | 1.145 | 53.1% | +12 | +5 | -105 | 66.4% | +1.22 | 10–3 (77%) | 6–5 (55%) | 104.2 | +1.18 | 2004 | 1753 | 138.7 | +2.34 | +0.87 | 1.125 | 52.5% | -65 | +168 | — | 54.3% | +0.26 | 10–5 (67%) | 8–4 (67%) | 106.7 | +0.79 |
| 26 | 2008 | 2051 | 160.2 | +2.18 | +5.30 | 1.128 | 52.8% | -4 | -41 | -104 | 71.0% | +1.43 | 17–8 (68%) | 10–8 (56%) | 103.5 | -2.32 | 2005 | 1687 | 135.3 | +1.78 | +3.46 | 1.309 | 56.7% | +11 | +137 | — | 49.0% | -0.02 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.3 | -0.43 |
| 27 | 2009 | 1988 | 160.0 | +3.77 | +5.90 | 1.216 | 54.3% | +41 | -23 | -33 | 71.7% | +1.67 | 9–10 (47%) | 7–6 (54%) | 93.9 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 1956 | 165.7 | +2.28 | +6.35 | 1.189 | 54.0% | +28 | -23 | — | 65.6% | +1.32 | 12–6 (67%) | 4–10 (29%) | 96.4 | -1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2125 | 161.4 | +1.36 | +5.78 | 1.141 | 53.0% | +11 | -53 | -91 | 62.8% | +0.92 | 146–93 (61%) | 82–64 (56%) | 106.3 | +0.35 | — | 1835 | 140.2 | +2.22 | +1.70 | 1.172 | 53.6% | -74 | +118 | — | 52.8% | +0.27 | 31–26 (54%) | 15–21 (42%) | 101.0 | +0.22 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Schnyder | 10 | 8 | 18 | Sep 4, 2008 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 5 | 11 | 16 | May 14, 2009 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 11 | 4 | 15 | Sep 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 5 | 10 | 15 | Sep 22, 2007 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 17, 2010 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | 4 | 3 | 7 | Aug 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Nathalie Dechy | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 17, 2005 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 26, 2005 | H2H |
| Elena Likhovtseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 14, 2004 | H2H |