H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Janette Husarova H2H: 1-0

Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2003 Canadian Open round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Janette Husarova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Dementieva #15 6-1 6-1 Janette Husarova #82 Match data Aug 14, 2003* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,125 483 245 66.3% 0 1 3 0 7 5 16
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Janette Husarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 38–20 65.5% #11 1,897 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,840 0 0 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,764 0 0 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,508 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0
22 2004 40–23 63.5% #6 1,975 0 4 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,544 0 0
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,916 0 4 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,541 0 0
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,922 0 6 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,524 0 0
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,969 0 8 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,502 0 0
26 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,050 0 11 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,489 0 0
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,987 0 14 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,526 0 0
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,955 0 16 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,716 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Dementieva Janette Husarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 25 10 35 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 24 13 37 64.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 27 14 41 65.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 4 5 9 44.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 28 15 43 65.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 24 13 37 64.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 24 11 35 68.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 33 10 43 76.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2009 35 11 46 76.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2002 17 15 32 53.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 9 12 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 287 142 429 66.9% 103 55 158 65.2% 41 20 61 67.2% 52 28 80 65.0% — 39 53 92 42.4% 30 42 72 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Dementieva Janette Husarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1493 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1479 106.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -21 -3 — 54.0% +0.38 1–7 (13%) 0–1 — +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1897 159.0 — — — — -23 -186 — 59.6% +0.65 17–7 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 112.6 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1841 149.4 — — — — +14 -69 -259 58.3% +0.58 8–10 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 95.9 +1.46 1993 1547 100.6 — — — — +34 — — 75.0% +0.38 — 1–0 — +0.39
20 2002 1764 143.8 — — — — +7 -19 -9 60.1% +0.78 7–16 (30%) 9–12 (43%) 87.6 +3.61 1994 1508 103.9 — — — — +39 +46 — 32.6% -1.23 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 98.6 +1.20
21 2003 1967 156.8 +1.60 +2.78 1.106 52.3% -16 -140 -134 61.8% +0.81 15–12 (56%) 10–3 (77%) 107.7 -1.46 1995 1477 101.2 — — — — +49 — — 23.1% -1.92 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
22 2004 1976 161.0 -0.64 +4.50 1.046 51.0% +8 -84 — 58.0% +0.42 14–4 (78%) 7–3 (70%) 108.8 -2.48 1996 1545 112.8 — — — — -4 +37 — 51.7% -0.07 2–6 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.72
23 2005 1916 156.8 -1.41 +5.17 1.059 51.3% +26 -5 -155 59.7% +0.74 18–6 (75%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 +2.18 1997 1542 102.2 — — — — -3 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — -0.04
24 2006 1922 155.6 -0.92 +5.86 1.077 51.8% +31 -42 -40 61.4% +0.70 18–3 (86%) 9–1 (90%) 116.2 +1.22 1998 1525 112.1 — — — — +6 +37 — 36.4% -1.00 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 +0.35
25 2007 1969 151.5 +0.08 +6.52 1.145 53.1% +12 +5 -105 66.4% +1.22 10–3 (77%) 6–5 (55%) 104.2 +1.18 1999 1502 104.4 — — — — — +26 — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.55
26 2008 2051 160.2 +2.18 +5.30 1.128 52.8% -4 -41 -104 71.0% +1.43 17–8 (68%) 10–8 (56%) 103.5 -2.32 2000 1490 103.1 — — — — +10 +53 — 42.9% -0.57 2–3 (40%) — — +0.68
27 2009 1988 160.0 +3.77 +5.90 1.216 54.3% +41 -23 -33 71.7% +1.67 9–10 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 93.9 -0.09 2001 1527 118.7 — — — — +9 +8 — 42.9% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 +0.95
28 2010 1956 165.7 +2.28 +6.35 1.189 54.0% +28 -23 — 65.6% +1.32 12–6 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 96.4 -1.18 2002 1717 138.8 — — — — -46 -61 — 53.0% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 107.9 -2.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1579 119.5 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% +16 +25 — 37.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1590 109.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1605 111.1 — — — — +9 — — 100.0% +4.25 — — — +0.07
Career — 2125 161.4 +1.36 +5.78 1.141 53.0% +11 -53 -91 62.8% +0.92 146–93 (61%) 82–64 (56%) 106.3 +0.35 — 1737 124.3 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% -4 +11 — 44.9% -0.45 25–32 (44%) 15–16 (48%) 100.2 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.