H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 3-5

Jelena Dokic holds a 5–3 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–1 on clay, while Elena Dementieva leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 2-6 4-3 RET.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Elena Dementieva #4 2-6 4-3 (ret.) Jelena Dokic #80 Match data
Mar 28, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #8 5-7 6-1 6-3 Jelena Dokic #16 Match data
Apr 11, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Jelena Dokic #11 4-6 6-4 7-5 Elena Dementieva #21 Match data
Apr 13, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Jelena Dokic #8 0-6 7-6(3) 6-1 Elena Dementieva #16 Match data
Feb 10, 2002* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Jelena Dokic #9 5-7 6-1 6-2 Elena Dementieva #15 Match data
Oct 7, 2001* Moscow WTA 1000 F Carpet Jelena Dokic #11 6-3 6-3 Elena Dementieva #13 Match data
Aug 22, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Jelena Dokic #14 4-6 7-5 6-4 Elena Dementieva #11 Match data
Aug 24, 2000* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #25 6-4 6-3 Jelena Dokic #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6