H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Jennifer Capriati H2H: 1-3
Jennifer Capriati holds a 3–1 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2004 US Open semifinal 6-0 2-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-0 2-6 7-6(5) | Jennifer Capriati | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-2 7-5 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 6-2 6-0 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Jennifer Capriati | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 |