H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Australian Open third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |