H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Kimiko Date H2H: 2-0

Elena Dementieva holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2010 Beijing round of 32 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Dementieva #9 6-3 1-6 6-3 Kimiko Date #57 Match data Oct 7, 2010* R32 Beijing WTA 1000 Hard
Elena Dementieva #6 3-6 6-3 6-4 Kimiko Date #61 Match data Jul 30, 2010* R16 Stanford WTA 500 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,125 483 245 66.3% 0 1 3 0 9 3 16
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 38–20 65.5% #11 1,897 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,840 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,764 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2004 40–23 63.5% #6 1,975 0 4 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,916 0 4 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,922 0 6 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,969 0 8 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,050 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,987 0 14 — — — — — — —
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,955 0 16 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Dementieva Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 25 10 35 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 24 13 37 64.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2004 27 14 41 65.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2005 28 15 43 65.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2006 24 13 37 64.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2007 24 11 35 68.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2008 33 10 43 76.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 35 11 46 76.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 287 142 429 66.9% 103 55 158 65.2% 41 20 61 67.2% 52 28 80 65.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Dementieva Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
15 1997 1493 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1479 106.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -21 -3 — 54.0% +0.38 1–7 (13%) 0–1 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1897 159.0 — — — — -23 -186 — 59.6% +0.65 17–7 (71%) 7–5 (58%) -1.83 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2001 1841 149.4 — — — — +14 -69 -259 58.3% +0.58 8–10 (44%) 4–6 (40%) +0.72 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2002 1765 143.8 — — — — +6 -20 -10 60.1% +0.78 7–16 (30%) 9–12 (43%) +2.89 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2003 1967 156.8 +1.60 +2.78 1.106 52.3% -16 -140 -134 61.8% +0.81 15–12 (56%) 10–3 (77%) -1.84 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2004 1976 161.0 -0.64 +4.50 1.046 51.0% +8 -84 — 58.0% +0.42 14–4 (78%) 7–3 (70%) -2.95 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2005 1916 156.8 -1.41 +5.17 1.059 51.3% +26 -5 -154 59.7% +0.74 18–6 (75%) 8–3 (73%) +0.61 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2006 1922 155.6 -0.92 +5.86 1.077 51.8% +30 -42 -40 61.4% +0.70 18–3 (86%) 9–1 (90%) -0.42 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2007 1969 151.5 +0.08 +6.52 1.145 53.1% +12 +5 -105 66.4% +1.22 10–3 (77%) 6–5 (55%) -0.28 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2008 2051 160.2 +2.18 +5.30 1.128 52.8% -4 -41 -104 71.0% +1.43 17–8 (68%) 10–8 (56%) -2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1988 160.0 +3.77 +5.90 1.216 54.3% +42 -23 -33 71.7% +1.67 9–10 (47%) 7–6 (54%) -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1956 165.7 +2.28 +6.35 1.189 54.0% +28 -23 — 65.6% +1.32 12–6 (67%) 4–10 (29%) -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 2125 161.4 +1.36 +5.78 1.141 53.0% +11 -54 -91 62.8% +0.92 146–93 (61%) 82–64 (56%) -0.91 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.