H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 5-0

Elena Dementieva holds a 5–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2004 Los Angeles third round 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #6 6-4 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #225 Match data
Apr 10, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Elena Dementieva #16 7-6(1) 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #58 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Elena Dementieva #11 6-4 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #43 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #25 6-3 6-7 7-6 Lilia Osterloh #57 Match data
May 17, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Elena Dementieva #26 7-6(2) 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0