H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 2-2
Elena Dementieva and Magdalena Maleeva are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on carpet, while Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2005 Miami third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2002 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Elena Dementieva | 6-2 0-6 6-1 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2001* | Nice | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 6-3 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2001* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |