H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Miroslava Vavrinec H2H: 1-0
Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Miroslava Vavrinec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 48
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-1 6-1 | Miroslava Vavrinec | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,124 | 483 | 245 | 66.3% | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 16 |
| Miroslava Vavrinec | #1,081 | #76 | 454 | 1,603 | 24 | 37 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Miroslava Vavrinec | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,898 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #83 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #119 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 56–17 | 76.7% | #4 | 2,050 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,987 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,955 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |