H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Rossana De Los Ríos H2H: 1-0
Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2002 Roland Garros third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 6-0 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Rossana De Los Ríos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |