H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 0-1
Sabine Appelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Dementieva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1998 Kremlin Cup third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1998* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 6-4 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Sabine Appelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 |