H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 4-1

Elena Dementieva holds a 4–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2010 US Open second round 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Dementieva #12 6-3 6-4 Sybille Bammer #85 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 SF Hard Elena Dementieva #7 6-1 6-3 Sybille Bammer #50 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #4 7-5 6-2 Sybille Bammer #26 Match data
Oct 3, 2008* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #4 6-1 6-4 Sybille Bammer #24 Match data
Sep 2, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sybille Bammer #20 6-1 6-2 Elena Dementieva #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2