H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-0

Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2003 Bali quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Dementieva #9 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #32 Match data Sep 13, 2003* QF Bali Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,125 483 245 66.3% 0 1 3 0 7 5 16
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,583 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2000 38–20 65.5% #11 1,897 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,840 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,764 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2004 40–23 63.5% #6 1,975 0 4 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,916 0 4 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,922 0 6 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,969 0 8 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,050 0 11 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,987 0 14 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,955 0 16 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Dementieva Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 25 10 35 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 24 13 37 64.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 27 14 41 65.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2005 28 15 43 65.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 24 13 37 64.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2007 24 11 35 68.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2008 33 10 43 76.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 35 11 46 76.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 287 142 429 66.9% 103 55 158 65.2% 41 20 61 67.2% 52 28 80 65.0% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/527 of Elena Dementieva's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elena Dementieva Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 8/72 1.3 3.9 63.6% 65.3% 42.0% 57.8% 70.6% 56.9% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 13/63 0.8 9.8 57.2% 62.8% 38.5% 44.9% 55.2% 52.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 21/63 0.8 8.7 57.0% 62.1% 39.9% 50.1% 50.1% 52.2% 50.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 46/66 0.8 8.4 60.8% 61.8% 41.0% 50.6% 49.1% 53.7% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 54/59 1.5 7.1 56.6% 64.7% 44.3% 48.3% 57.1% 55.7% 50.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 59/73 1.5 4.1 64.0% 63.4% 45.2% 57.6% 53.0% 56.9% 48.6% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2009 67/73 1.9 5.8 60.2% 67.3% 47.2% 57.5% 53.7% 59.5% 49.3% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2010 51/58 1.5 4.7 64.7% 63.3% 47.4% 56.6% 54.7% 57.9% 50.0% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 319/728 1.4 6.2 60.8% 64.1% 44.5% 53.8% 53.9% 56.5% 49.7% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Dementieva Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1493 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1479 106.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.13 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -21 -3 — 54.0% +0.38 1–7 (13%) 0–1 — +1.54 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2000 1897 159.0 — — — — -23 -186 — 59.6% +0.65 17–7 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 112.6 -1.08 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2001 1841 149.4 — — — — +14 -69 -259 58.3% +0.58 8–10 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 95.9 +1.46 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2002 1764 143.8 — — — — +7 -19 -9 60.1% +0.78 7–16 (30%) 9–12 (43%) 87.6 +3.61 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2003 1967 156.8 +1.60 +2.78 1.106 52.3% -16 -140 -134 61.8% +0.81 15–12 (56%) 10–3 (77%) 107.7 -1.46 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2004 1976 161.0 -0.64 +4.50 1.046 51.0% +8 -84 — 58.0% +0.42 14–4 (78%) 7–3 (70%) 108.8 -2.48 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2005 1916 156.8 -1.41 +5.17 1.059 51.3% +26 -5 -155 59.7% +0.74 18–6 (75%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 +2.18 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2006 1922 155.6 -0.92 +5.86 1.077 51.8% +31 -42 -40 61.4% +0.70 18–3 (86%) 9–1 (90%) 116.2 +1.22 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2007 1969 151.5 +0.08 +6.52 1.145 53.1% +12 +5 -105 66.4% +1.22 10–3 (77%) 6–5 (55%) 104.2 +1.18 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2008 2051 160.2 +2.18 +5.30 1.128 52.8% -4 -41 -104 71.0% +1.43 17–8 (68%) 10–8 (56%) 103.5 -2.32 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2009 1988 160.0 +3.77 +5.90 1.216 54.3% +41 -23 -33 71.7% +1.67 9–10 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 93.9 -0.09 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2010 1956 165.7 +2.28 +6.35 1.189 54.0% +28 -23 — 65.6% +1.32 12–6 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 96.4 -1.18 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 2125 161.4 +1.36 +5.78 1.141 53.0% +11 -53 -91 62.8% +0.92 146–93 (61%) 82–64 (56%) 106.3 +0.35 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.