H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Elena Dementieva and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass, while Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2007 Beijing fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | 6-2 6-0 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Sep 21, 2007* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard |
| Tamira Paszek | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Elena Dementieva | Match data | Jun 30, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,125 | 483 | 245 | 66.3% | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 16 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,897 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 56–17 | 76.7% | #4 | 2,050 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,987 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,955 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |