H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Dementieva vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-1
Elena Dementieva and Tathiana Garbin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay, while Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2005 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2005* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-1 6-1 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| May 4, 2002* | Bol | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 5-7 7-5 7-5 | Elena Dementieva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Dementieva | Tathiana Garbin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |