H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Amy Frazier H2H: 4-2

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 4–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Hobart third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2004* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #68 6-2 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #38 Match data
Jan 11, 2003* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Amy Frazier #42 6-3 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #43 Match data
Jul 31, 1998* Stanford WTA 250 R16 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #26 6-1 6-4 Amy Frazier #60 Match data
Feb 25, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Elena Likhovtseva #45 7-6 3-6 6-1 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Mar 2, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #48 7-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #13 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Elena Likhovtseva #62 7-5 2-6 7-5 Amy Frazier #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8