H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 4-3

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 4–3 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 2–1 on clay, while Elena Likhovtseva leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #17 6-2 6-2 Anna Smashnova #59 Match data
May 11, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anna Smashnova #41 6-1 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #18 Match data
Apr 6, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Elena Likhovtseva #16 5-7 6-1 6-2 Anna Smashnova #35 Match data
Jan 3, 2003* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Anna Smashnova #16 6-3 7-6(3) Elena Likhovtseva #42 Match data
Apr 4, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 R32 Clay Anna Smashnova #37 6-2 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #38 Match data
Aug 18, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #21 3-6 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #45 Match data
Jan 21, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #75 2-6 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Anna Smashnova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —