H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Anne Kremer H2H: 1-2
Anne Kremer holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Amelia Island fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2002* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anne Kremer | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Kremer | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2001* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-1 7-6(5) | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |