H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 3-0
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 3–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2001 Hamburg third round 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Elena Likhovtseva | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elena Likhovtseva | 7-6(8) 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1995* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elena Likhovtseva | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |