H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 1-2
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1997 Hope Island semifinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1997* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-4 6-3 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1996* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 7-6 6-3 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1995* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-1 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 |